Additional readings and various perspectives

Abbott, A., Cyranoski, D., Jones, N., Maher, B., Schiermeier, Q., & Van Noorden, R. (2010). Metrics: Do metrics matter? Nature, 465(7300), 860–862. http://doi.org/10.1038/465860a

Hicks, D., Wouters, P., Waltman, L., de Rijcke, S., & Rafols, I. (2015). Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature, 520(7548), 429–431. http://doi.org/10.1038/520429a

Raff, J. W. (2013). The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment [DORA]. Biology Open, 2(6). http://doi.org/10.1242/bio.20135330

Sahel, J.-A. (2011). Quality versus quantity: assessing individual research performance. Science Translational Medicine, 3(84), 84cm13. Retrieved from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3338409/

Sugimoto, C. (2016). Bloomington Faculty Council adopts policy on responsible metrics. Retrieved from http://inside.indiana.edu/editors-picks/campus-life/2016-05-04-from-the-desk.shtml

Wang, J., Veugelers, R., & Stephan, P. (2016). Bias against Novelty in Science: A Cautionary Tale for Users of Bibliometric Indicators. NBER: Cambridge, MA. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w22180

Wilsdon, J., et al. (2015). The Metric Tide: Report of the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management. http://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4929.1363